Monday, April 13, 2020

Bureau of Prisons Covid-19 Release Policies Quietly Expanding


DOJ Scrambles to Spin Covid-19 Cases and Deaths but Quietly Expands Release Criteria

by Derek Gilna

            Each day of the last week has brought dizzying changes in federal prison policy relating to Covid-19 release criteria, driven not only by the Attorney General, but also public opinion, and lawsuits from both individual prisoners and federal prison guard unions. Local, rural communities adjacent to prisons rightly fear that their limited health care facilities will be overwhelmed by the disease's spread.  DOJ still has not done sufficient testing and fails to properly protect prisoners and prison employees from the deadly virus, ineptly "quarantining" sick with healthy prisoners, and "spinning" and "minimizing" the crisis. DOJ's systemic Covid failures are front-page news everywhere.
            Those "non-violent," non SO, "non-violent" prisoners over 60 who have served roughly half of their sentences, and who have CDC-defined risk factors are being prioritized, but the only certainty in this statement is that it will change, based upon other factors that REALLY drive DOJ policy: fear of bad publicity and ACLU and prisoner lawsuits. Close to 1000 have already been released to home confinement, including one who had an "escape." Prison medical treatment is so substandard that every member of prison staff should be held liable if you are denied release, and are then infected, as a violation of policy, not to mention the 8th Amendment. More on that next week.
            What if you are not on the "list?" Start the clock by filing a request for Compassionate Release, citing "extraordinary and compelling" reasons, including Covid-19, especially if you meet the aforementioned criteria. That request can be in writing or via email;   keep a copy.   If you are rejected, or the warden fails to respond in 30 days, First Step permits you to file WITHOUT exhausting administrative remedies, although never a bad idea to continue filing them.  Start working on a release plan, and gather your medical and programming evidence, as a matter of routine, for possible future use. By all
means, put prison staff on notice that your physical health is threatened by their inaction.
            Despite the pandemic pandemonium, federal courts are still all put and running, although oral arguments have been put on hold. In USDC, WD of Louisiana at Lake Charles, a class action by prisoners at Oakdale progresses before Judge Doughty, alleging DOJ misconduct, forcing DOJ to defend its practices. Livas, et al., v Myers, 20-cv-422.  
            In US v Smith, 19-1615, (1st Cir. 4-8-20), the court reversed a denial of FSA relief, after finding eligibility for a sentence reduction of a 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) charge,  because his offense was a "covered offense" for FSA purposes, citing supporting cases from most appellate circuits, and that the result was supported by Congress's intent.
In US v Oliver, 17-15565, (11th Cir. 4-8-20), the court reversed, stating that making terroristic threats is not a predicate violent felony under ACCA.
            In this week following Easter and Passover, let not your heart be troubled.

Federal Legal Center, Inc., Derek A. Gilna, JD, Director
113 McHenry Rd. #173, Buffalo Grove, IL (And also Indiana)
dgilna1948@yahoo.con.  Google blogspot: Derek Gilna Criminal Justice Blog