Monday, March 30, 2020

Covid-19 Puts Unprecedented Pressure on Bureau of Prisons to Release Prisoners


DOJ Operations Reel Under Onslaught of Covid-19, Congressional, Advocate, and Public Pressure

by Derek Gilna

            Your voices have been heard. As the outside world does its best to stay safe, DOJ, and the publicity-adverse federal prison system,  has been inundated by hundreds of thousands of letters, emails, articles, and Congressional probing and emergency legislation to take action in this crisis. In an unprecedented move, AG Barr issued a directive to his embattled  staff of 113,000 to consider home confinement to reduce prisoner counts. As of now, there are no known updates to this directive.
            The new Corona virus relief bill signed by the President this past week permits Barr to authorize expanded use of home confinement, if he finds that "emergency conditions will materially affect the functioning of the Bureau." However, if past experience is any indicator of future performance, your letters to wardens seeking compassionate release based upon "extraordinary and compelling" circumstances (which are uniformly denied) will have to be promptly followed up by a filing with your sentencing court. Although there as yet few reported cases, some courts have already granted relief, but only in the case where requests for release are documented and well pleaded, in FSA Compassionate Release petitions.
            Ironically, Senate Resolution 549 calls for April to be designated "Second Chance Month," uncomfortably highlighting for all to see the results of decades of DOJ mismanagement, especially  of its prison health-care procedures. DOJ employee unions are also putting serious pressure on upper management to respond to the crisis, making it even more probable that if DOJ does not take decisive action, the courts can and  will. However, the courts can only rule on petitions put before them.
            In the circuits, there is some good news to report. The prisoner-unfriendly 11th Circuit has ruled that Hobbs Act robbery does not qualify as a "crime of violence" under the Sentencing Guidelines, USSG Section 4B1.2(a), vacated multiple convictions for resentencing. U.S. v Eason, 16-15413 (11th Cir. 3-24-20).
            In U.S. v Gary, the court ruled that "we hold that (his) guilty plea was not knowingly and intelligently made because he did not understand the essential elements of the offense to which he pled guilty. Because the court accepted (his) plea without giving him notice of an element of the offense the ...error is structural...(and)we vacate his guilty plea and convictions and remand..."
            The 7th also vacated a guilty plea of two men, holding that their prior state convictions were not prior drug convictions, where certain Indiana convictions were not countable as predicate drug offenses because the Indiana statute reached at least two other substances not includable under federal law. U.S. v. De La Torre, 18-2009, (10-19-19). Thanks to my fellow Prison Legal News and Criminal Legal News writer Dale Chappell, who has written extensively on this subject and is the author of a book on this very subject.             Stay safe, and Let Not Your Heart be Troubled.

Federal Legal Center, Inc, Derek A. Gilna, J.D., Director
113 McHenry Rd., #173, Buffalo Grove, Il   60089
(Also in Indiana) dgilna1948@yahoo.com