Monday, February 17, 2020

First Step Act Reforms Now Fully Funded


New Budget Shows that Administration is Serious About Criminal Justice Reform

by Derek Gilna

            "Show me the Money," is certainly one of the most iconic movie quotations in recent memory, and it accurately sums up criminal justice lawyers and advocates  sometimes cautious view of the impact of the First Step Act (FSA). We agree that it is hard to get excited about these FSA changes, when every day you have to endure the daily indignities from the under-trained-and-under-paid DOJ employees, some of whom feel that they are above the law. The new DOJ budget shows, however, that the Administration is fully funding these reforms.
            Many months after closing some halfway houses, cutting current prison staffs, and freezing hiring new workers, the President has begun to bypass the entrenched prison bureaucracy.    $244 million is now going to Residential Reentry Center programs to fulfill the mandate that DOJ have pre-release custody available for all, adding 8700 beds.   $37 million has been budgeted for behavioral therapy and medication for drug dependence. $23 million has been devoted to evidence-based recidivism-reduction, and $15 million devoted to NEW staff to work on FSA programs (only). Other staffing cuts remain.
            Speaking of money (saved), there is a strong push for the Senate to take up HR 4018, that would allow elderly prisoners to transition to home confinement for the remainder of their sentence, saving millions. This bill had strong support in the House, passing by a voice vote (highly unusual these days), meaning NO ONE in the 435-member House objected to its passage. It awaits Senate action, when that chamber recovers from the delays caused by the impeachment proceedings.
            Meanwhile, the President has also been aggressively courting African-American and Latino voters with advertising and programs, and hinting at additional clemencies and pardons in private meetings with supporters, knowing that gaining even minor additional votes in November will propel him to reelection.
            In the circuits, in US v Keleta, 18-2896, ( 8th Cir. 2-6-20) the court reversed and remanded a conviction on the sole grounds of eliminating a four-level role enhancement, finding that "the government failed to carry its burden of proving that (it) applied,"  and by failing to "identify any potential participants...at trial."
            In US v Serrano, 19-5141 (consol), 2-12-20, the court vacated a career offender designation and remanded for resentencing. His defense lawyer had failed to object to that designation at sentencing, but the appeals court determined that his prior Texas conspiracy to possess with intent to deliver cocaine did not qualify as a predicate offense, finding "clear error."  

Have a good week,. Let not your heart be troubled.

Federal Legal Center, Inc., Derek A Gilna, JD, Director
113 McHenry Rd. #173, Buffao Grove, IL   60089
(Also in Indiana) dgilna1948@yahoo.com