House Overwhelmingly Passes EQUAL Act, Sends It to Senate; DOJ Fails to Follow CDC Testing Requirements; Lompoc Covid Class Action Continues; Fascinating new U of C Study on How Incarceration Doesn't Reduce Recidivism; Supreme Court Accepts New Case Seeking Wider FSA relief; New Compassionate Relief Grants for Non-Covid Grounds; An example of how DOJ Alters Medical Records; FCI Phoenix Censors Us
by Derek Gilna
The US
House voted 361-66 to pass the EQUAL Act to end the statutory disparity between
powder and crack cocaine sentences. Now it moves to the Senate, where it enjoys
considerable bi-partisan support, with co-sponsors Senators Rob Portman (R-OH),
Cory Booker (D-NJ), Rand Paul (R-KY), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Thom Tillis (R-NC),
and Patrick Leahy (D-VT). Although there is little opposition to the bill in
the Senate (other than the usual suspect from
Senator Durbin also introduced in the past week S. 2914:" A bill to amend the First Step Act of 2018 to permit defendants convicted of certain offenses to be eligible for reduced sentences, and for other purposes." There is no text available but we will follow this closely.
Although DOJ acts as if it doesn't exist, Delta refuses to go away, as the numbers of infected continue to climb, while the number of cases in the public at large continue their decline. Thus far, there are few reported cases of MU or other variants bypassing vaccine protections, so that is a bit of good news. However, take a look at the latest excerpts from the CDC on testing protocols for correction institutions: "Ensure that separate physical locations (dedicated housing areas and bathrooms) have been identified to 1) isolate individuals with confirmed COVID-19 (individually or cohorted), 2) isolate individuals with suspected COVID-19 (INDIVIDUALLY – do not cohort), and 3) quarantine close contacts of those with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 (ideally individually; cohorted if necessary). The plan should include contingencies for multiple locations if numerous infected individuals and/or close contacts are identified and require medical isolation or quarantine simultaneously...
Testing persons with signs or symptoms consistent with COVID-19, regardless of vaccination status: Incarcerated/detained persons with symptoms, regardless of COVID-19 vaccination status, should be given a mask , moved to medical isolation in a separate environment from other individuals, medically evaluated, and TESTED. Facility staff should carefully evaluate and support the mental health needs of individuals before and during medical isolation. If incarcerated/detained persons receive a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2, they should remain in medical isolation until they meet the criteria for discontinuing isolation,... A single new case of SARS-CoV-2 infection in any correctional and detention center staff or incarcerated/detained person should be considered an outbreak. If an outbreak is occurring, facilities should also perform daily symptom and temperature screening for all incarcerated/detained persons who have been exposed to someone with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 until it has been at least 14 days since the last positive test. " www.cdc.com. I am unaware of any DOJ facility that is following this protocol, hence there continue to be outbreaks and unnecessary illness, risk of death, and suffering
Although CARES
releases continue, infection numbers have climbed in the most overcrowded (or
poorly-managed) facilities. From Alderson Camp: " We have 645 inmates
here...positive cases that have been found in GP and moved to our
Perennial
hot spot Carswell had another death in the past week: "Carswell ...is out
of the tests to test us...the women are complaining of symptoms but can't get
tested and they are leaving them in the CC5 unit... the most vulnerable
inmates...I am a care level 4 and have already been hospitalized for a month
with lung problems and still have long Covid symptoms... since Monday they we
have had 12 test positive we were told they are out of test so go figure..."
The
long-running
A
fascinating new study from the
."Based on a much larger meta-analysis of 116 studies, the current analysis shows that custodial sanctions have no effect on reoffending or slightly increase it when compared with the effects of noncustodial sanctions such as probation... All sophisticated assessments of the research have independently reached the same conclusion. The null effect of custodial compared with noncustodial sanctions is considered a “criminological fact.” Incarceration cannot be justified on the grounds it affords public safety by decreasing recidivism. Prisons are unlikely to reduce reoffending unless they can be transformed into people-changing institutions on the basis of available evidence on what works organizationally to reform offenders." https://www.journals.uchicago.edu.
The US Supreme Court as granted cert to a new petition, 20-1650, Carlos Conception v. US, which sets forth this question: Whether, when deciding if it should “impose a reduced sentence” on an individual under Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, 21 U.S.C. § 841 note, a district court must or may consider intervening legal and factual developments.
Another
example of why you need to make sure that your medical records accurately
reflect your chronic medical problems: "Today I had a pulmonary function
test because of damage to my lungs from the virus. Here's the disturbing part:
I had the virus in June of 2020, the PFT wasn't approved until
(DOJ) intentionally delayed my treatment so there would be no record of any damage done by the virus. Now it's too late because my motion got denied and if I file again it would be useless because now they say the vaccine is fixing everything. I still have to use my inhaler several times a day. That won't ever go away. And they wonder why I don't trust government employees, like I'm wrong for not trusting them."
One of the many new cases reducing sentences based upon FSA
considerations, with no Covid justification is
The district court rejected
his motions for 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) sentence reduction, based on Sentencing
Guidelines Amendment 782, which reduced most base offense levels in the
U.S.S.G. 2D1.1 Drug Quantity Table. The Ninth Circuit reversed. The legislative
and judicial developments affecting mandatory
statutory minimums are relevant considerations to the 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) factors
at step two of a motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2).
The district court apparently believed that it did not have the discretion to
consider such developments.
FCI
Phoenix, apparently unhappy that we reported the accurate Covid counts at its
institution, blocked our newsletter, but this will not deter our continued
reporting of facts, not government propaganda. (Keep the alternate email of
dagilna1948@yahoo.com close, just in case.) Be
not afraid, and let not your heart be troubled.
Derek Gilna, Director, JD, MARJ,
federallc_esp@yahoo.com, Spanish newsletter, but NO inquiries.
Blog: "Derek
Gilna's Federal Criminal Justice Musings and Reflections."