Biden's Lack of Urgency on Justice Reform Puts New Emphasis on "First Step" Petitions to Get Relief; Will Senate Take the Lead on Reform? CDC Issues DELTA Variant Warnings with 67, 000 new cases Last Week; Lack of Guard Vaccinations Put Prisoners at Risk; Important Case Filings in Fourth Circuit
by Derek Gilna
It has been a bad week for the Biden administration, as sentence reform advocates
hammer the White House for lack of urgency on promised
justice reforms. The explanation for the
delay in granting clemencies and pushing the bills pending in Congress is
simple: spiking big-city crime, up 30% in
However, today Senators Grassley and Durbin announced that THEY will take the lead at pushing those many criminal reform measures through Congress if the White House does not take prompt action.
There is no question that there is a direct correlation between a court filing for compassionate release (where valid grounds for relief exists, even if unsuccessful) and a CARES release. I do not believe in coincidences, but I suspect that the federal prison system knows that its computerized medical records purposely understates the poor health of many prisoners, and that it actively scans compassionate release court filings for information on individuals that are truly at risk.
Meanwhile,
the DELTA variant continues to make its mark, especially among the
unvaccinated, and is once again beginning its march through jails and prisons. Tallhassee,
Aliceville, Carswell,
The prison
in
A paper by Gregory Hooks of the Sociology Department of McMaster University, argues that lack of guard vaccinations and high COVID counts in prisons have directly contributed to COVID spread in communities surrounding jails and prisons.
"Mass Incarceration, COVID-19, and Community
Spread,"
As noted in
the Wall Street Journal, "the Delta variant is perhaps two to three times
more transmissible than the original virus that first emerged from
It appears
that, "10% to 30% of all Covid-19 patients suffer from symptoms weeks and
months after first getting the illness, including many young, previously
healthy people, whose initial Covid-19 cases were mild. Symptoms can include brain fog, fatigue,
shortness of breath, racing heart beat, and an inability to tolerate physical
or mental exertion....Most people...have
dormant, normal harmless viruses...that they contracted earlier,...Such viruses
can be reactivated at times by stress, including infections." "Are
Latent Viruses behind Long Covid-19 Symptoms?" www.wsj.com,
Under these circumstances, those both inside prison, those on the CARES waiting list, and those already on home confinement, would be well-advised to file sentence reduction motions under the (so-called compassionate release) statutory provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). This would resolve the potential legal limbo in which CARES releasees now find themselves, which could be perfectly described as constituting "extraordinary and compelling reasons" for a sentence reduction, especially if prosecutors cannot show how the 3553(a) factors would be better served by a return to prison.
Yet another
study, a report by the governmental "Pandemic Response Accountability
Committee: Key Insights: Covid-19 in Correction and Detention
Facilities,"
The Delta
coronavirus variant surging across the
In the circuits, you may recall the split Sixth Circuit panel opinion in US v. Jarvis, No. 20-3912 (6th Cir. June 3, 2021), which stated that "non-retroactive changes in the law [can] not serve as the 'extraordinary and compelling reasons' required for a sentence reduction." However, there is nothing in the text of § 3582(c)(1)(a) that supports the contention that non-retroactive changes in the law cannot ever constitute "extraordinary and compelling reasons" to allow a sentence reduction, either alone or in combination with other factors.
The good news that the inimitable Shon Hopwood has filed a powerful amici brief in the rehearing en banc on Jarvis, which effectively destroys the slim majority's argument: " this Court should refrain from holding that factors are legally impermissible unless consideration of those factors conflict with the statutory text. To do otherwise is to substitute this Court’s judgment for Congress’s. Because a district court’s consideration of non-retroactive sentencing-law reforms as extraordinary circumstances does not contravene any contrary statutory command, it is legally permissible (and is in fact consistent with the legislative history and plain text of the First Step Act)...."
Hopwood was one of the first advocates to note that the First Step Act had empowered judges to review former decision previously only reachable by difficult second-successive 2255 petitions, and paved the way for thousands of prisoner resentencings and releases. Let's hope that this argument has a similar effect.
Be not afraid. Let not your heart be troubled.