Monday, June 29, 2020

BOP Releases Continue as Federal Prisoner Totals Continue Decline


Releases Continue as COVID-19 Continues to Spread in Prisons; Prisoner Counts Fall

by Derek Gilna

            As COVID-19 continues its spread in federal prisons, federal prisoner counts have continued to fall as more judges grant home confinement or outright release, and fewer people come into the system. Judges can read, and I expect the releases to continue for months.
              This crisis has already led to emergency policy reforms, but DOJ is still hampered by bad data, and worse management. Less than 20% of federal prisoners, about 20,000,  have been tested. (Illinois, no model of efficiency,  tests more than that in a day.)  Eight off the top 10 virus clusters in the US are now in prisons, as prisons continue to fail to conform to CDC guidelines for best practices.  The CDC has also broadened the criteria for risk to include people with a body-mass of 30, instead of 35. There also continues to be little or no DOJ consistency transfer of prisoners from one prison to the next, with some institutions blocking movement while others continue to create problems by bringing prisoners from facilities where the virus has a foothold.
            All major polls show that 95% of Americans are  in favor of at least some criminal justice system and police reform, after the recent protests and the FBI/DOJ Russia  and  Michael Flynn scandals that exposed widespread abuse of police and prosecutorial power. Regardless of the November election results, a year from now the federal justice system will look much different than the current swampy mess.
            Although the federal courts are operating at reduced capacity and few in-court proceedings except for emergencies, the circuits have been busy. In the 9th circuit, a Rehaif case did not result in sentence relief, but broadened a court's inquiry into the issue even when it was not properly raised in the district court stating, "the panel saw no basis...for limiting its review to the record adduced at trial, as the record on appeal contains additional evidence..." US v Johnson, 17-10252, 6-25-20.             In the 8th, in US v. Birdine, 19-1782, 6-22-20, the court granted FSA relief in an 841 and 846 cocaine case, and reversed and remanded for resentencing.
            Another important case in the 7th, which considers itself an incubator for legal though and precedent-setting decisions, the court incorporated language that furthered the reach of FSA: "we hold that (FSA) is its own procedural vehicle...the only limits on the district court's authority (under 404 of FSA) come from the interpretation of (FSA) itself." Nonetheless, the appeals court end up holding that the district court  did not abuse its discretion in denying cocaine-case sentence relief under the facts of this case. U.S. v Sutton, 19-2009, 6-23-20.
            Those of you with recently completed direct appeals or cases that might be impacted by FSA should consider your options, which include a 2255 alleging inadequate representation of counsel, or a petition to your sentencing court for possible sentence relief.  Have a good week, and let not your heart be troubled.

Federal Legal Center, Inc., Derek A. Gilna, JD, Dir.
113 McHenry Rd, #173, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 (Also in Indiana)
dgilna1948@yahoo.com, Blogging at "Derek Gilna's Criminal Justice Blog,"