Wednesday, February 2, 2022

Christmas in January: Thousands Released by First Step Credits; PATTERN Classifications Next For Congressional Scrutiny;

 

Christmas in January: Thousands Released by First Step Credits; PATTERN Classifications Next For Congressional Scrutiny; Accountability on Horizon for COVID Incompetence? DOJ Inspector General Criticized; Covid and Circuit Updates.

 

by Derek Gilna

 

            After dragging out the implementation of First Step Act Sentence Credits as long as possible, DOJ finally began the long-awaited process of releasing individuals who were entitled to immediate release, in some cases months after they should have been released. In the past two weeks, almost 5000 prisoners have been released to either halfway house, home confinement, or to outright release. Legal experts are still considering whether DOJ is financially liable for keeping individuals in custody unnecessarily, but that subject will be revisited in a future column.

            So for those remaining, who exactly is eligible to apply FSA Time Credits toward pre-release custody or supervised release? Those in federal custody who have successfully participated in Evidence-Based Recidivism Reducing Programs (EBRR or Programs) or Productive Activities (PA), those classified as “minimum” or “low” risk for at least one assessment or who can obtain warden approval, and those individuals who earned credits equal to the remainder of their prison term. DOJ has apparently backed off its initial opinion that certain orderly positions were ineligible for sentence credit.

            Thos who are serving state convictions, those who have a final order of removal under immigration law, those with a sentence for a conviction the First Step Act identifies as disqualifying, as those with certain, generally violent, current or prior convictions. These credits can be applied toward pre-release custody (halfway house or home confinement transfers) or early transfer to supervised release (essentially shortening the sentence), with a one cap, but people may be transferred to pre-release custody earlier.

            What about those who have been classified as "medium," who are eligible to earn, but not to immediately apply those sentence credits? Since this is an arbitrary  DOJ interpretation of a law, you should send a cop out to your case manager for an immediate re-classification if you feel that it was unjust.  In my opinion, this is immediately judicially reviewable, without resorting to administrative remedies.

            From where you sit, it can be hard to process, but I can tell you that I have never seen such outright inter-governmental scrutiny directed to DOJ and the federal prison system. The pandemic exposed many federal agencies as grossly incompetent, and DOJ's procedures, decision-making, and reputation have also taken a huge hit, with well under half of the US population saying they have lost trust in it and the rest of its agencies. The past week the DOJ Inspector General was caught by a federal special prosecutor, John Durham,  investigating the "Russiagate" manufactured scandal, for withholding important evidence, including key cell phones. This comes as no surprise to me, since these institutions all generally work together to protect themselves and their cronies, but  the truth has a way of eventually coming out. However, in the past year there has been a welcome movement in and out of Congress to "rein in" unaccountable agencies, such as DOJ. It will not be an easy or quick process.

            Another area that has been negatively impacted has been prisoner nutrition. The national menu is almost never followed, in any institution, and this combined with chronic commissary shortages, has had a negative effect on prisoner health This is reflected in the high number of OMICRON and DELTA related infections and deaths among prisoners in the past two or three months. According to one prisoner: " food is terrible - expired milk, moldy bread, not following BOP national menu at all for the last three weeks."  This combined with spotty or non-existent prison health care, makes federal prisoners as a group vulnerable to COVID.                                                       Turns out that it is not our imagination that prisoners are more vulnerable to OMICRON than the outside world. " The Consequences of Incarceration for Mortality in the United States," by Sebastian Daza, Alberto Palloni, and Jerrett Jones, published in Demography , www.ncbi.nim.nig.gov, states the obvious:  "an emerging line of research considers the consequences of incarceration for individual’s health and well-being. Recent studies find that those with an incarceration history report higher chronic health problems (Schnittker & John, 2007), lower self-reported health (Massoglia, 2008a), higher obesity (Houle & Martin, 2011), more infectious diseases, stress-related illness (Massoglia, 2008b), and psychological disorders (Massoglia & Pridemore, 2015).           The tragic infection and death rates at Alderson and Carswell could have been avoided if DOJ had actually had an "Action Plan," that was not merely a piece of paper to be  with the courts, but an actual training program circulated to Regional and prison authorities. With the pandemic now approaching two years, one would think that DOJ would actually have a clue on what to do, other than "Mixing and Matching" positives and negatives, based upon what staff have themselves told prisoners at many locations. Amazingly, both Alderson and Carswell continue to have more NEW infections, and they are certainly not alone.                                                                                                                                       FPC Duluth has yet another outbreak, and its neighbor FMC Rochester has seen "official" cases for prisoners climbing well above 50, and approximately half of that for staff. Peterson, Yazoo City, Thompson, Camp Lee, Butner-all units, Oakdale, FCI Schuylkill, ALiceville, Gilmer, and Pekin, both men and women's affected, with all these instituions in Code Red, with full, or almost full lockdowns, and high levels of infection.          Weren't we told by the government, and now certain federal courts, that if you are vaccinated, you are not at risk?   Not so fast: In early August 2021, the director of the Oxford Vaccine Group, professor Sir Andrew Pollard, actually spoke out against the idea that the COVID shots were the answer everyone was looking for. At the time, he referred to the idea that vaccine-induced herd immunity against COVID was “mythical.” As reported by Yahoo! News, Aug. 10, 2021:4 “… Pollard … said … that herd immunity is ‘not a possibility’ with the current Delta variant. He called the idea ‘mythical,’ warning that vaccine programs should not be developed around it. During that same APPG meeting, professor Paul Hunter from the University of East Anglia stressed that variants capable of evading the COVID shots were “an absolute inevitability.” Pollard and Hunter both turned out to be correct, as Omicron’s vaccine-evading capacity has now been documented. Yahoo News, Aug. 10, 2021.                                                                               Current methods of PATTERN classification are also under review. US Attorney General Merrick Garland has directed the department to look for ways to assess racial bias and make the tool more transparent, a spokeswoman said. One option is to adjust the cutoff points between the risk categories, allowing more prisoners to earn credits for release, which would "maximize access to First Step Act relief while ensuring public safety," she said. DOJ  has to reevaluate the 14,000 people in prison who got lumped into the wrong category. "This is just one example of the ways that harmful artificial intelligence systems are being rolled out in everything from the criminal legal system to employment decisions to who gets access to housing and social benefits," said Sasha Costanza-Chock, director of research and design for the Algorithmic Justice League, which studies the social implications of artificial intelligence.

          In US v Benton, 19-7471, (4th Cir.,  January 24, 2022), the Fourth Circuit reversed the district court's denial of defendant's 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion seeking to vacate his sentence. The district court found that defendant qualified as an armed career criminal by relying on prior convictions that were not identified as predicates in defendant's presentence report and of which he had no notice at sentencing. The court concluded that the district court's finding was contrary to United States v. Hodge, 902 F.3d 420 (4th Cir. 2018), which held that the government cannot rely on collateral review on ACCA predicates that were not identified at sentencing, in order to preserve an enhancement that no longer can be sustained by the original predicates. Because there was a Hodge violation in this case, the court vacated defendant's 18 U.S.C. 922(g) sentence and remanded for resentencing.

       In US v. Freeman,   19-4104, ( 4th Cir. January 25, 2022), on rehearing en banc, the court vacated defendant's sentence for possession with intent to distribute hydrocodone and oxycodone. Instead of pursuing defendant's objections, counsel relied entirely on a motion to enter a drug court diversion program (the BRIDGE program) that could have permitted defendant, if admitted, to enter treatment instead of going to prison. The court concluded that defendant clearly received ineffective assistance of counsel where counsel was unequivocally wrong on the law when he waived her meritorious objections to the PSR on the ground that none of those objections reduce the number that is relevant to this court. Rather, if successful, defendant's objections would have reduced the low end of her Sentencing Guidelines range by almost ten years. Because counsel's deficient performance prejudiced plaintiff, the court remanded for resentencing.                                        In US v White, 19-4886, ( 8th Cir. January 27, 2022), White was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. In determining White’s sentence, the district court applied the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) 18 U.S.C. 924(e), based on three prior convictions for “violent felonies,” including Virginia common law robbery. The court imposed the ACCA’s mandatory minimum sentence of 180 months’ imprisonment. White argued that he did not qualify as an armed career criminal because Virginia common law robbery can be committed without the actual, attempted, or threatened use of physical force, by threatening to accuse the victim of having committed sodomy. The Virginia Supreme Court responded to a certified question: Under Virginia common law, an individual can be convicted of robbery by means of threatening to accuse the victim of having committed sodomy “if the accusation of 'sodomy’ involves a crime against nature under extant criminal law.” The Eighth Circuit then vacated the sentence. Virginia common law robbery can be committed without proving as an element the “use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force,” an element required for prior convictions to qualify as predicate offenses under the “violent force” provision of the ACCA.

 

"Act like what you do makes a difference.   It does."    Henry James.

 

Be not afraid, and let not your heart be troubled.

 

Derek Gilna, Director, JD, (De Paul Law School , 1975), MARJ, (Vermont Law School, 2020), Federal Legal Center, 113 McHenry Rd. #173, Buffalo Grove, IL   60089 (and Indiana); dgilna1948@yahoo.com (English newsletter and ALL inquiries, English or Spanish); (Alternate email: dagilna1948@yahoo.com).

federallc_esp@yahoo.com, Spanish newsletter, but NO inquiries.

Blog:  "Derek Gilna's Federal Criminal Justice Musings and Reflections."