Monday, March 15, 2021

Stimulus of $1400 Will Also Include Prisoners; Biden's DOJ Revisits "Covered Sentence" Crack Laws

 

Positive Changes at DOJ under Garland and In Congress on the Horizon; DOJ Changes Course on "Covered Sentence" Crack Cases; Prisoners WILL get the $1400 Stimulus

 

by Derek Gilna

 

            According to the Vera Institute in 2021, "The number of people incarcerated in state and federal prisons and local jails in the United States dropped from around 2.1 million in 2019 to 1.8 million by mid-2020--a 14 percent decrease." Of course, unless you are one of the 14 percent this is of little interest to you, but that silence that you hear is the public NOT objecting to all of the early releases and home confinements. In fact, the atmosphere for further reform has never been better. Unlike under most of Obama's and Trump's time in office, the Democrats hold most of the levers of power, and reform has broad bipartisan appeal.

            In fact, plans are in the works to increase funding for the First Step Act and the kinds of educational and job training programs, including "earned time credits," which lets people shorten the length of their sentences by completing various programs.

The other proposed improvements is to reform an incredibly harsh supervised release system, with invasive and demeaning monitoring and jail time for technical offenses. Also, there is strong support for the Safer Detention Act., the Smarter Sentencing Act, and other initiatives that expired in the last Congress.

            Newly introduced Senate Bill 739 is a bill "to specify the state of mind required for conviction for criminal offenses that lack an expressly identified state of mind." If adopted, it would provide a potent defense to a lot of often subjective and amorphous white-collar offenses.

            DOJ has also signaled that it now supports the crack retroactivity provision of the First Step Act in SCOTUS case Terry v United States, 20-5904, which concerns which crack offenders have a so-called "covered offense" under Section 404 of the First Step Act that would allow for their retroactive resentencing. This clears the way for crack-related prisoners to file for resentencing.

            Despite an attempt to prevent them from doing so, prisoners will be eligible to receive the new $1400 stimulus. If you filed for the stimulus before (even if not yet received) you should receive the new payment at the same address. I do not recommend a REFILING just because the first two payments were delayed.

            One of the unsettling factors that has contributed to the still high COVID-19 infection rate among federal prisoners is the well documented reluctance of prison staffs to wear masks, sanitize, and follow the DOJ directives. As inoculations have begun in prisons,  "corrections employees are refusing vaccines at alarming rates, causing some public health experts to worry about the prospect of controlling the pandemic both inside and outside. Infection rates in prisons are more than three times as high as in the general public. Prison staff helped accelerate outbreaks by refusing to wear masks, downplaying people’s symptoms, and haphazardly enforcing social distancing and hygiene protocols in confined, poorly ventilated spaces ripe for viral spread." Marshall Project, 3-15-21.   (Sound familiar?)

            As the new and more deadly mutant variants of COVID-19 cross the country, prisons will be in a poor position to resist it. Wall Street Journal,  3-12-21. Also according to the WSJ,  the failure of DOJ to vaccinate prisoners with vaccines other than those doses refused by guards puts the federal prisoner in a vulnerable position. "Where you have a partially vaccinated population, or a partially immune population with lots of virus circulating, that's kind of your danger point." said University of Bern molecular epidemiologist Emma Hodcroft.

            Also highly disturbing is the August 21, 2020 report by the CDC, that contains statistics submitted by three unnamed federal prisons, along with a dozen state institutions, that show federal prisons had among the lowest number and rate of tests administered, and the highest number of reported cases despite that lack of testing. This flies in the face of CDC guidance which states the following: "testing staff members at regular intervals, regardless of symptoms, could become an important port of...prevention...; (COVID-19) was three times higher in  dormitory-based housing (42.6%) than in cell-based unit (14.6%); (and) mass testing...occurred 2-41 days after identification of the facilities first cases." Hagan, LM, Williams SP, Spaulding AC, et al. Mass Testing for SARS_CoV-2 in 16 prisons and jails, April-May 2020, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020:19:1139, quoted in www.cdc.gov.

            There are many who suggest that the mass outbreaks in places like Waseca, Butner, and Carswell were a result of "deliberate indifference," and perhaps something even more. In it's 8-1-20 article, "What COVID-19 Prison Outbreaks Could Teach Us About Herd Immunity," the organization noted the examples of the  Holmsberg and Stateville prisons (non DOJ facilities) in the fifties and sixties, where experiments regarding diseases and bacteria were performed on prisoners without their consent. All reputable health experts agree that there is no such thing as "herd immunity" from everyone catching the virus (and hopefully recovering), UNLESS there is vaccination rate of at least 80% of the affected class of individuals.

            I encourage people to consider not only compassionate release cases (if you feel that you have a serious medical condition), but also 404 motions, commutation/pardons, or all three. The COVID-19 debacle in federal prisons has alerted most judges to the horrific conditions on the inside, (with numerous OSHA violations)  which in most places, has not improved, with high COVID counts at, among others, FMC Rochester, and Schuylkill, which continues to require assistance from other federal agencies. 

            Also, do not overlook a 2255 habeas.   In US v. Pressley, 19-6222, (4th Cir. 3-11-21), the defendant "alleges that he repeatedly asked his trial counsel to file a motion to suppress certain incriminating statements he made to law enforcement officers before his arrest." It was remanded for an evidentiary hearing, which if successful, would result in a  resentencing.

            Be not afraid, and let not your heart be troubled.

Federal Legal Center, Derek A. Gilna, JD, MARJ, Director

113 McHenry #173, Buffalo Grove, Il  60089, (and Indiana)

dgilna1948@yahoo.com, blogging at "Derek Gilna's Criminal Justice blog."